Skip to main content

INTRODUCTION TO LAW OF TORTS

 

               INTRODUCTION TO LAW OF TORTS

     


  
             

 

What is a wrong?

Wrong is something, which is :

Ø Illegal

Ø Socially or morally opposed

Ø Harmful to others

Ø Unacceptable to the society etc.

 

Wrongs may vary from:

Ø Culture to culture

Ø Society to society

Ø Religion to religion

Ø Country to country etc.

 

For example:  Drinking wine in the west is allowed, but prohibited in Muslim societies. Similarly, eating cow meat in Indian society may be considered as a wrong, however, it’s pretty normal in Pakistani society.

 

 

 

Classification of wrongs:

Wrongs may be classified into:

Ø Criminal wrongs: also known as crimes/offences.



Ø Civil wrongs: it is further divided into :

1)   Breach of contract.      2) Breach of trust.

                         3).Torts

 

 

WHAT IS MEANT BY RIGHT-IN-REM AND RIGHT-IN-PERSONAM?

 

Right-In-Rem:

Ø These are the rights available to an individual against the public at large/whole society.

Ø For example, Your right not to be defamed, your right not to be tortured, your right of privacy not to be violated etc are the rights available to you against the public at large.

 

Right-In-Personam:

Ø This right is available to you against specific induvidual (party).

Ø For example, Right to fulfill a contract.

 

 

 

WHAT IS A TORT?

Ø Tort is a civil wrong, not a crime. It is the violation of right-in-rem and not a right-in-personam. It is therefore, different from breach of contract.

Ø It normally, not always results in some corporeal damage/harm.

Ø It is a wrong in which a plaintiff may sue a defendant for damages (compensation in money).

 



 

ESSENTIALS OF A TORT:

1)  Civil wrong:

Ø Civil wrongs are against, generally speaking, an individual.  Public wrong is against state/government/society.

Ø Civil wrongs do not pose any threat to the state/society. Public wrongs (crimes) pose threat to the security of the state.

Ø Civil wrongs are, therefore, passively dealt by the civil admin of justice. Since, public wrongs pose threat to the public at large, therefore, they are actively dealt by the criminal administration of justice.

 

 

 

 

 

2)  Infringement Of Right-In-Rem:

A tort is an infringement of right-in-rem and not of a right-in-personam. A right-in-rem is a right available to a person against the society/pubic at large.  For example, one's right not to be assaulted or defamed.

 

 

3)  Right fixed by law:

The right infringed must be a right which is recognized/fixed by the law.

 

4)  Common law Action:

The action available in respect of such a violation should be a common law action.

 

5)  Remedy:

The remedy should be by means of damages(compensation in money). In torts, mostly damages are awarded , however, other remedies like injunction, reception etc may also be granted.

 

 

 

 

 

 

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A TORT AND A CRIME:

1)  Infringement;

In torts, there is a violation of private right, while in crime public right is infringed.

 

2)  Wrong:

Tort is a civil wrong, while crime is a criminal wrong.

 

3)  Procedure:

Ø In torts, the injured party brings an action and is dealt by civil courts under civil procedure code.

Ø In crimes, proceedings are conducted in the name of sovereign and the guilty person is punished by the state under criminal procedure code.

 

4)  Remedy:

Ø In torts, the wrong doer has to compensate the injured party in money (damages).

Ø In criminal wrongs, the wrong doer is punished by the state either with fine or imprisonment or with death.

 

5)  Negligence:

In torts, normally, there is a slight/small negligence. However, in crimes there is a gross negligence.

6)  Parties:

Ø Torts: Plaintiff vs Defendant

Ø Crime: Accused vs Prosecution of the state.

 

7)  Origin:

  Law of crimes is later in origin than the law of torts.

 

 

 

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A TORT AND A BREACH OF CONTRACT:

 

1)  Infringement:

Ø Torts: violation of right-in-rem .

Ø Breach of contract: violation of right-in-personam.

 

2)  Duty:

Ø Torts: duty is imposed by the law.

Ø Contract: duty is imposed by the contract.

 

 

3)  Privity:

Ø Torts: No probity exist in torts.

Ø Contract: there always exist probity between the parties.

 

4)  Damages:

Ø Torts: Damages are not limited/fixed and it can be exemplary.

Ø Breach of Contract: Exemplary damages are not awarded, only stipulated money is recovered.

 

5)  Consent:

Ø Torts: obligation arises independently of any consent.

Ø Breach of Contract: obligation is founded on the consent of the parties.

 

 


 

 

                             THE END

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ownership In Islamic law

  Concept of ownership in Islamic jurisprudence 1.Overview The concept of ownership (milk) is very important as it relates to a man's worldly desires and with reference to which men deal with one another. 2. Definitions A) According to Sadru'sh Shariat: "It is the expression of the connection existing between a man and a thing(shayun), which is under his absolute power and control to the exclusion of control and disposition by other".   B) "The relationship that exists between a person and a thing that gives absolute control and right of disposal over it to the exclusion of others."   C) “Ownership is the power of exclusive control and disposition”.   2) Malik (owner)          “ The person who posses power of exclusive control and disposition over an object / thing, is called the Malik(owner) of that thing. 3) Essentials of ownership A) Absolute Control B) Right of disposition C) Non-...

KANEEZ FATIMA CASE

      KANEEZ FATIMA CASE     Citation: (PLD 1993 SC 901)   Parties : KANEEZ FATIMA : (Appellant) WALI MUHAMMAD and others: ( Respondents )   Status : Appeal Dismissed.   Facts & Figures: Ø In   Kaneez   Fatima   the   husband   and   wife   agreed   to   mutually   dissolve   their   marriage with effect from 1-11-1977 and the wife received rupees 10,000 and five tolas (one tola is equal to 12 grams) of gold in lieu of the prompt dower of rupees 30,000 and 20 tolas of gold and a monthly maintenance of rupees 200. Both the parties agreed that they will   have   no   further   claim   in   future   against   each   other.   However,   on   6-4-1978   the appellant   filed   a   suit   for   recovery   of   the   remaining   amount   of   dower ...

DE-CODING FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (F.I.R.)

        DE-CODING FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (F.I.R) Upon receiving information about the commission of a cognizable offence, police prepares a written document called First Information Report (F.I.R). Anyone who knows about the commission of a cognizable offence can lodge an F.I.R. The informant/person lodging F.I.R may be: ·       The victim or any person on behalf of the victim, ·       witness, ·       police, ·         a minor etc.   Even a telephone call is sufficient to register an F.I.R. The object of F.I.R is to set the criminal justice system/machinery of law in motion, enabling the police to investigate the offence. No F.I.R means no investigation and no conviction. First Information Report has no evidentiary value and it must be lodged at the earliest, because any unreasonable delay in lodging F.I.R creates a room to do...