Topic: - Meaning, Nature and Functions of Law
1.
Introduction
The term “Law’ denotes different kinds of rules and Principles. Law is an instrument which regulates human conduct/behavior. Law means Justice, Morality, Reason, Order, and Righteous from the view point of the society. Law means Statutes, Acts, Rules, Regulations, Orders, and Ordinances from point of view of legislature. Law means Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, and Injunctions from the point of view of Judges. Therefore, Law is a broader term which includes Acts, Statutes, Rules, Regulations, Orders, Ordinances, Justice, Morality, Reason, Righteous, Rules of court, Decrees, Judgment, Orders of courts, Injunctions, Tort, Jurisprudence, Legal theory, etc.
2.
Meaning of Law
In old English “Lagu” i.e. law,
ordinance, rule, regulation from old norse “lagu” law collective Plural of
“Lag” is layer, measure, stroke ‘Literally’ something laid down of fixed.
The term law has different meanings in different Places/societies at different times (as it is subject to amendments). In Hindu religion law implies “Dharma” in Muhammadean religion (Islam) it is “Hokum” in Roman its “Jus”, in French, its “Droit” in Arabic, Alqanoon, in Persian and Turkish, its Kunoon, in Latin its “Legam” in Philipino its “Batas” in Albanian language its “Ligj” in Czech its “Zakon” in Danish its “Lor” in Dutch its “Wet” in Italian its “Legge” and in Lithuanian its “Teise” and so on. It varies from place to place in the sense adultery is an offence in India (under section 497 of the Indian penal code, 1860) while it is no offence in America. Law differs from religion to religion in the sense personal laws viz. Hindu law, Muslim law etc. differ from one another.
For instance, A Muslim
can have four wives living at a time, but, a Hindu can have only one wife
living at a time (Monogamy). If a Hindu male marries again during the life time
of first wife he is declared
guilty of the offence of bigamy and is Punishable under sec.
494. The law is subject to change
with the change in society and also change in the Government/legislative
through the amendments/Acts.
First it is used to mean “legal
order”. It represents the regime of adjusting relations, and ordering conduct
by the systematic application of the force of organized political society.
Secondly, law means the whole body of
legal Percepts which exists in a politically organized society.
Thirdly, law is used to mean all
official control in a politically organized society. This lead to actual
administration of Justice as contrasted with the authoritative material for the
Guidance of Judicial action. Law in its narrowest or strict sense is the civil
law or the law of the land.
3.
Definitions of law:-
It is very difficult to define the
term law. Many Jurists attempted to define the term law. For the Purpose of
clarity, some of the definitions given by Jurists in different Periods are
categorized as follows.
(I)
Idealistic Definitions:-
Romans and other ancient Jurists
defined law in its idealistic nature. Roman Justinian’s defined law in the
light of its idealistic nature.
(a) Salmond: -
According to salmond “the law may be defined as the body of principles
recognized and applied by the state in the administration of Justice.
Criticism of Salmond’s definition of law:- Salmond did not define the expression
Justice. Keeton says what has been considered to be just at one time has
frequently not been so considered at another.
Criticism by Dean Roscoe Pound: - Dean Roscoe Pound has criticized the definition of Salmond
as reducing law to a mass of isolated decisions and the law in that sense to be
an organic whole. Further, it is criticized on the ground that Salmond’s definition applies only
to lax law not to Statute.
Despite criticism, Salmond’s
definition is considered as the workable definition.
(b) John Chipman Gray’s Definition of Law:-
According to Gray, “the Law of the
State or of any organized body of men is composed of the rules which the courts,
that is the judicial organ of the body lays down for the determination of legal
rights and duties.
Criticism of Gray’s definition of law:-
Gray’s definition is criticized on
the Ground that he is not concerned with the nature of law rather than its
Purposes and Ends. Further it does not take into account the statute law.
(ii) Positivists' definition:-
(a)
Austin’s definition of law”
John Austin (1790-1859) An English
Jurists expounded the concept of analytical positivism, making law as a command
of sovereign backed by sanction. He developed logically, a structure of legal
system in which he gave no Place to values, morality, idealism and Justice.
According to Austin, a law, in the
strict sense is a general command of the sovereign individual or the sovereign
body. Issued to those in subjectivity and enforced by the physical power of the
state. According to Austin “law is aggregate of rules set by men politically
superior or sovereign to men as politically subject.” Austin says, “A law is
command which obliges a person or persons to a course of conduct.
Criticism of Austin’s definition of law:-
Austin’s definition of law is
subjected to criticism on the ground that it ignores completely the moral and
ethical aspects of law and unduly Emphasized the imperative character of law.
(b) Holland’s definition of law
Thomas Erskine Holland, a reputed
Jurist, who followed the Austin’s concept and nature of law attempted to define
law as law is a General rule of external human action enforced by a political
sovereign. Holland also measures or defines law with preference to sovereign
devoid of moral, ethical or ideal elements which are foreign to law and Jurisprudence.
(c) John Erskine definition of law
Law is the command of a sovereign,
containing a common rule of life for his subjects and obliging them to obedience.
(c) Hans Kelsan’s definition of Law
According to Kelsan legal order is
the hierarchy of the norms, every norm derive its validity from the superior
norm and finally there is highest norm known as grundnorm.
(d) H.L.A.Hart
According to Hart Law is the
combination of primary rules of obligations and secondary rules of recognition.
Definition of Historical school of Law
The chief exponent of the Historical
school is Von Savigny. Historical Jurisprudence examines the manner or growth
of a legal system. It deals with general principles governing the origin and
development of law and also the origin and development of legal conceptions and
principles found in the Philosophy of law.
Savigin’s definition of law:-
Savigny says that law is not the product of direct
legislation but is due to the silent growth of custom or the outcome of
unformulated public or Professional opinion. He says that law not as a body of
rules set by determinate authority but as rules consist partly of social
habitat and partly of experience. He says law is found in the society, it is
found in custom.
Sociological school of law
The sociological school commenced in the middle of nineteenth century, According to sociological school the common field of study of the Jurist is the effect of law and society on each other. This approach takes law as instrument of social progress.
(a) Ihering’s Definition of law
Ihering defines law as ‘the form of
Guarantee of the conditions of life of society, assured by state’s power of
constrain. He says law is a means to an end and end of the law is to serve its
purpose which is social not individual.
(b) Dean Roscoe Pound’s definition of law
Pound defines law as a social
institution to satisfy social wants. He says law is a social engineering, which
means that law is a instrument to balance between the competing or conflicting interests.
(c) Dias’s Definition of
law
Law consists largely of “ought”
(normative) Propositions prescribing how people ought to behave the “ought” of
laws are variously dictated by social, moral, economic, political and other
purposes.
(IV)
Realist definition of law
It is branch of sociological school.
It studies law as it is in its actual working and effects. It has been summed
up by its exponent professor K. Llewellyn as “ferment”
According to Georges Guroitch the
neo-realistic school represents a violent reaction against the dominantly
theological and moralizing orientation of “sociological Jurisprudence”
Holmes J. The
realist considered the law to be a part of judicial process. He says, “that the
prophesies of what the courts will do, in fact and nothing more pretentions,
are what I mean by law.
4.
Origin of law
Ancient Egyptian law, dating as far back as 3000 BC had a civil code that was probably broken into twelve books it was based on the concept of Ma’at characterized by tradition rhetorical speech, social equality and impartiality by the 22nd century BC, Urnammu an ancient Sumerian ruler, formulated the first law code consisting of casuistic statements (if…then…”) Around 1960 BC king Hammurabi further developed Babylonian law, by codifying and inscribing it in stone. Hammurabi placed several copies of his law code throughout the kingdom of Babylon as Stelae, for the entire public to see this became known as the codex Hammurabi.
Ancient India and china represent
distinct tradition of law, and had historically independent schools of legal
theory and practice. The Arthashastra, dating from the 400 BC and the
Manusmriti from 100 BCE were influential treatises in India, but this Hindu
tradition, along with Islamic law was supplanted by the common law when India
became part of British Empire. Malaysia, Brunei, Singapore and Hongkong also
adopted the common law. Japan was the first country to begin modernizing its
legal system along western lines by importing bits of the French but mostly the
German Civil Code. Similarly traditional Chinese law gave way to westernization
towards the final years of the dynasty in the form of six private law codes
based mainly on the Japanese modal of German law.
One of the major legal systems
developed during the Middle Ages was Islamic law and jurisprudence. During the
classical period of Islamic law and jurisprudence “Hawala” and institution of
law was an early informal transfer system which is mentioned in text of Islamic
Jurisprudence as early as the 8th century. Hawala itself later
influenced the development of the “Aval” in French civil law and Avallo in
Italian law. Roman law was heavily influenced by Greek teachings.
5.
Nature of law
What is the nature of law? This
question has occupied center stage Jurisprudence and philosophy of law in the modern
era, and has been the central occupation of contemporary analytic
Jurisprudence. This entry in the legal theory Lexicon aims to give an overview
of the “what is law” debate.
Historically, the answer to the
question, “what is Law” is thought to have two competing answers. The classical
answer is provided by natural law theory,
which is frequently characterized as
asserting that there is an essential relationship between law and morality and
Justice.
The modern answer is provided by
legal positivism, which as developed by John Austin, asserted that law is the
command of the sovereign backed by the threat of punishment.
Contemporary debates over the nature
of law focus on a revised set of positions legal positivism is represented by Analytical legal positivists, like
H.L.A Hart Joseph raza and Jules Coleman.
The natural law tradition is defined
by John Punis and a new position, interpretivism is represented by the work of
the late Ronald Dworkin.
In some ways, the title of this
lexicon entry is misleading because of focus on the “what is law” question as
it has been approached by contemporary legal philosophers.
There are other important
perspectives on the nature of law that focus on law’s functions rather than the
meaning of the concept for criteria of legal validity. For example, the
sociological tradition includes important work on the nature of law by Max
Weber and Niklas Lahumann. These issues are discussed by Brian Tamanaha in a
very clear way.
This lexicon entry maps the territory
of the “what is Law”? Controversy, and provides introductory sketches of the
major positions as always, the lexicon is written for law students.
6. Functions of law
Ever since the down of Human
civilization, mankind has had some sort of rule or that they used to Govern
itself in society laws set the standard in which we should live in if we want
to be part of society. Law set up rules and regulations for society so that we
can freedom, gives Justice to those who were wronged, and it set up that it
protects us from our own Government.
Most importantly the law also
provides a mechanism to resolve disputes arising from those duties and rights
and allows parties to enforce promises in a court of law (Corley and Reed 1986 P.A)
According to Corley and Reed (1986)
law is a body of rules of action or conduct Prescribed by controlling
authority, and having legal binding forces.
Laws are created because it helps
prevent chaos from happening within the business environment and as well as
society. In business law sets guide lines regarding employment regulatory,
compliance, even inter office regulations.
7. Role of law in Business:-
The rule of law plays an important
role in the business world when set setting a business it is the laws that
determine what type of business it is to became, and the structure is to be
formed.
Also the law sets up a reasonable
expectation on how the business should operate in order to protect the business
owner’s interest of the Customer of that business. The rule of law not only
allows people to understand what is expected of them in their personal
capacities but also set forth rules for business so that they, too know what is
expected of them in their dealing and transactions ( Johnson & Lalu 2014)
the law protects those who work for a business. it sets Guideline of how treat
your employees, equal opportunities, pay scale, hours, breaks, benefits and
long with a host of other right privileges. In short the laws for business
create an honest environment where consumers and business owners interest can
be protected and we have ways to solve of any disputes arise. If these laws are
in any ways are violated it sets up Guidelines for punishment.
8. Role of law in Society:-
Without law our society would be
chaotic, uncivilized mess and anarchy would reign supreme.
The role that law has in society is
that it creates a norm of conducts in the society we live in laws are made to
protect its citizen from harm. It set in way that all citizens are given equal
opportunity, protection from harm no matter your race, Gender, religion and
social standing.
Under the law all its citizens are guarantee equal protections. In society laws are made to promote the common good for everyone. That is sets up Guideline for everyone in society to act in way that brings the Greater Good. Everyone acted without thinking about the Greater Good, society would revert to those days where survival of the fittest was the common sight.
We live in world where we have finite
amount of resources should shared or used. Laws are made on how to manage these
and how we resolve if issues arise over these resources. If know laws were in
place these sources would be controlled by the string and the wealthy.
1.
Introduction
Law is used in different senses. The
use of the term “law” is made in various senses. It denotes different kinds of
rules and Principles.
Blackstone says “law in its most
general and comprehensive sense signifies a rule of action and is applied
indiscriminately to all kinds of action whether, animate, rational, irrational.
Thus we say the law of motion of gravitation of optics or Mechanics, as well as
the law of nature and nations” it is helpful in understanding the different
senses in which “law” is used in various fields of knowledge.
2. Kinds of law by Sir John Salmond
Sir
John Salmond refers to eight kinds of law
1.
Imperative law
2.
Physical or
scientific law
3.
Natural or moral law
4.
Conventional law
5. Customary law
6.
Practical or
technical law
7.
International
law, and
8.
Civil law
1.
Imperative law
Imperative law means a
rule of action imposed upon by some authority which enforces obedience to it.
In other words it is a command enforced by some superior power either
physically or in any other form of compulsion.
Kinds of Imperative law:-
There are two kinds of imperative law, Divine or human
1.
Divine laws
2. Human laws
1. Divine laws are consists of the commands imposed by God upon men either by threats of Punishment or by hope of his blessings.
2.
Human laws are
the laws by analogy
Sir Jhon
Salmond classifies Human Laws into four sub classes
1.
Imperative law
imposed and enforced by State is called “Civil law”
2. Imperative law imposed and enforced by members of society is “Moral law”
3. Those imposed and enforced by different institutions or autonomous bodies like Universities, airline companies etc they are called “Autonomic law”
4. Those imposed upon States by the society of States are called “ International law”
2. Physical
or scientific law
Physical laws are the expressions of the
1. Uniformities of
nature and General Principles Expressing the
2. Regularity, and
3. Harmony
observable in the activities and operations of the universe.
They are not the creation of men and
cannot be changed by them. Human laws change from time to time and from country
to country but physical laws are invariable forever. The uniform actions of
human beings, such as law of psychology, also fall into this class they express
not what man ought to do, but what they do.
3. Practical or Technical law:-
It consists of Principles and rules
for the attainment of certain ends e.g. laws of health, laws of architecture.
These rules guide us as to what we ought to do in order to attain certain ends.
4.
Natural or Moral law:-
It has various other names such as,
“the Moral law” “Divine law” “God Law” ‘universal or eternal law and “law of
reason” etc. “by natural law is meant the principles of natural right and wrong
(the Principles of natural Justice)”. Natural laws have been called
Divine
law:- commands of God imposed
upon men.
Law of Reason i.e. being
established by that reason by which the world is Governed.
Unwritten law:- (as being written not an brazen
tables or a pillar of stone but by the finger of nature in the hearts of
people. universal or common law (being of universal validity)
Eternal
law (being
uncreated and invariable)
Moral law (being
the expression of the Principles of morality)
5.
Conventional law:-
It is the body of rules agreed upon
and followed by the concerned parties to regulate their mutual conduct. It is
form of special law and law for the parties which can be made valid or enforced
through an agreement.
A Good example of the
conventional law is the International law, laws of cricket or any other game,
rules of club. It has been father divided into two groups which are:-
1. Rules enforced by the parties themselves but not recognized by the State e.g. the rules of hockey.
2. Rules which are recognized and enforced by the State, e.g. contract etc.
6.
Customary law:-
Customary laws are those rules of
custom that are habitually followed by the majority of the persons subject to
them in the belief of binding nature.
According to Salmond,
customary law means “any rules of action which is actually observed by men (any
rule which is the expression of some actual uniformity of voluntary action)
“when a custom is firmly established it is enforced by the authority of the
State. Custom is not law by itself but an important source of law only those
customs acquired the force of law, which are recognized by the courts.
7.
International law:-
According to “Hughes” international
law is the body of Principles and rules which civilized States consider as
binding upon them in their mutual relations. “ it can be as the name for the
body of customary and conventional rules, which are considered legally binding
by civilized States in their intercourse with
each other”. According to Salmond
it is considered of these rules which the sovereign States have agreed to
observe in their dealings with one another.
International agreements are of two types: They are either expressed or implied.
Express agreements are contained in
treaties and conventions, while implied agreements are to be found in the
custom or practice of the States. International law is of two kinds:
I: Public International law: It prevails universally
all over the world.
II: Private International Law: It is enforced only
between some of States.
8. Civil Law
It is the law of the States regarding the land “Civil Law” according to the Salmond , is “the law of State of or the law of the land, the law of lawyers and the law of the courts”. Civil law is the positive law, or law of the land which means the law as it exists. It is backed by the force and might of the State for purposes of enforcement. Civil law differs from special law as the latter applies only in special circumstances the other term is used for the civil law is Municipal Law and national law.
Topic:- CLASSIFICATION OF LAW
1. Introduction
Etymological meaning of
classification is “the process of putting something into category” or the basic
cognetive process of arranging into classes or categories. For a proper and
logical understanding of law its classification becomes necessary. As it
elucidates the way of systematic logical structure of the legal order. It
explicates the inter relation of rules and their effect to each other. It
analysis the law that intern is helpful in codification of laws it is an
arrangement of rules in a concise and systematic way.
2.
Original and Meaning of
the Classification of Law
Notion of classification is very old.
Classification was first made by Roman Jurists. The ancient Hindu Jurists also
laid down eighteen titles or heads of “Vyavahara” civil law. The distinguished
civil and criminal law and classified crime law under various heads.
There are two limitations in
classification of law first; any classification will have only a relative value
and no universal principle or rules can be laid down for it. With the onward
march of time, old rule changed their nature and the field of application and
new rules based on different Principles come into existence. Therefore, a new
classification becomes necessary. Roman Jurist analyzed law in old times but
that classification is Vague to present world.
Second, any classification made
keeping in view the law of a Particular community or nation is not applicable
to the law of any other Community or nation.
For Example; if one commits a breach
of promise to marry, in English law, it falls under contract, but in French law
it falls under delict.
So, it’s not possible to discuss the
classifications given by various Jurists, only a General Classification shall
be given which has been adopted by most of Jurists of the modern times.
Classification of Law
(1) International Law, and (2)Municipal or National Law
3.
International law:- The Present form
of international law is of recent origin some earlier Jurist were of the view
that the international law is not law as it lacked many elements which law
should have. Austin and his supporters were of this view. Some says
international law is law and it is superior to the municipal law Kelson
supports this view.
What is International Law?
The legal Process that concerns legal
relations among nations is called international law. Belief and experience some
form international law dates from at least the days of the Roman Empire.
The united nation is are of the
Primary mechanism that articulate and create international law.
The major sources of international
law are multilateral Treaties, international custom and such General Principles
as are recognized by civilized nations.
According to some Jurists international law may be
divided into two classes.
(1) Public international law, and
(2) Private international law
(1)
Public
international law is that body of rules which govern the conduct and relations
of States with other, really speaking; the term international law is used for
this class of law.
Private
international law means those rules and Principles according to which the cases
having foreign element are decided for example, if a contract is made between
an Indian and Pakistani and it is to be performed the rule and Principles on
which the rights and liabilities of the Parties would be determined would be called Private international law.
This class of law is called “Conflict of laws” also. After knowing the field of
application of this class of law, it is clear that the adjective
“international” is wrongly given to it because it applies to individuals and
not to States and these rules and Principles (called Private international law)
vary from State to State and thus lacked uniformity. This class of law is
enforced by municipal courts which administer municipal law and not
international law, so, such a law does not process the characteristics of
international law.
In modern times this class of law has
gained much importance and every States has made rules for its administration.
Therefore, it must be properly classified. It is submitted that it should be
given the name “Conflict of Laws” and not private international law and should
be treated as a branch of municipal Private law and should be classified as such.
4.
The Municipal law, Law of land, Civil law, or law applied within a State is divided into
two classes:-
(i) PUBLIC LAW
(ii) PRIVATE LAW
i) PUBLIC LAW:-
The State activities are largely regulated by Public law. It determines and regulates the
organization and functioning of the State and determines the relation of the
State with the subject. public law may be divided into three classes:-
(A) Constitutional law
(B)
Administrative law
(C)
Criminal law
(A)
Constitutional law: By constitutional law is meant that
law which determines the nature of the State and the Structure of the
Government. It is above and superior to the Ordinary law of the land.
Constitutional law is the basic law or fundamental law of the State. The
constitutional law may be written as in India or unwritten as in England. In
modern times there is tendency to adopt written constitution.
(B)
Administrative Law:- Administrative law deals with the
structures powers and the functions of organs of the administration, the limits
of their Powers, the methods and Procedures followed by them in exercising
their powers and functions; the methods by which there power are controlled
including the legal remedies available to a person against them when his rights
are infringed by their operation.
(C)
Criminal law:- Criminal law defines offences and
prescribes punishment for them. Its aim is the prevention of and punishment for
offences. Criminal law is necessary for the maintenance of order and peace
within the State. In civilized societies crime is considered to be wrong not
only against the individual (who has been wronged) but a wrong against the
society. Therefore, the State initiates the proceedings against the offender,
and thus it is always a party in criminal
cases. This is why the criminal law is considered as a branch of public law.
(iI)
Private Law: - This branch of law regulates and
governs the relations of citizens with each other. The parties in such cases
are private individuals and the State through its judicial organ adjudicates
the matters in dispute between them. In these cases the State takes the
position of only an arbiter. But it does not mean that the State regulates all
the conducts and relations of the citizens but regulates only such of them as
are of public importance and these relations (which State regulates) constitute
the civil rights of the citizens. The major part of municipal law consists of
this branch of law but in Totalitarian States the public law regulates the
major part of the social life.
In the Classification of private law
there is great difficulty. Different Jurists have given different
classification, a very General classification is as follows:-
1.
The law of Persons
2.
The law of Property
3.
The law of obligations
4.
The conflict of laws
The law of obligations is divided into three classes.
(i)
Contract
(ii) Quasi contract, and
(iii) Tort
The classification is only substantive law. The procedural law and Evidence are also the branches of the Private law.
5. Conclusion
Above classification defective: - The above classification of law has many defects. Many of the classes do not exist in many legal system at all some branches of law which has developed in recent years cannot be put under any one class exclusively.
Therefore, the above classification is neither universal nor exhaustive. Many other Jurists have made classifications based on different principles. But these too have been made keeping in view the law of a particular nation; therefore, they are not satisfactory and have no wide application.
New developments; A new classification necessary: - In modern times, new branches of law are fastly growing and developing. These laws are of such composite nature that they partake the nature and characteristics of many of branches of the law and do not fall into any one class exclusively for example we may take the commercial law. It cuts across the two branches of law i.e the law of obligation and the law of property. Similarly, industrial law also partakes the characteristics of many branches of the law.
With the change in the concept of the
State and law many branches of private law have shifted and have become part of
the public law. In totalitarian States this change has taken place to a
considerable degree. Under these circumstances it is necessary to make a
comprehensive and complete classification which might cover the recent
developments of law for this purpose a very close study of the laws of various
nations and various branches of law must be made.
THE END
Comments
Post a Comment